On the Statistical and Heuristic Difficulty Estimates of a High Stakes Test in Iran

Authors : Ali Darabi Bazvand, Sheila KHEİRZADE, Alireza Ahmadi

Pages : 330-343

Doi:10.21449/ijate.546709

View : 12 | Download : 5

Publication Date : 2019-10-15

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :The findings of previous research into the compatibility of stakeholders’ perceptions with statistical estimations of item difficulty are not seemingly consistent. Furthermore, most research shows that teachers’ estimation of item difficulty is not reliable since they tend to overestimate the difficulty of easy items and underestimate the difficulty of difficult items. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze a high stakes test in terms of heuristic insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(test takers’ standpoint); and statistical difficulty insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CTT and IRT); and investigate the extent to which the findings from the two perspectives converge. Results indicate that, 1); the whole test along with its sub-tests is difficult which might lead to test invalidity; 2); the respondents’ ratings of the total test in terms of difficulty level are almost convergent with the difficulty values indicated by IRT and CTT, except for the two subtests where students underestimated the difficulty values, and 3); CTT difficulty estimates are convergent with IRT difficulty estimates. Therefore, it can be concluded that students’ perceptions of item difficulty might be a better estimate of test difficulty and a combination of test takers’ perceptions and statistical difficulty might provide a better picture of item difficulty in assessment contexts.
Keywords : Classical true score theory, Heuristic difficulty, High stakes test, Item response theory, Statistical difficulty