A Comparison of type I error and power rates in procedures used determining test dimensionality

Authors : Gül GÜLER, Nükhet ÇIKRIKÇI

Pages : 697-712

Doi:10.21449/ijate.1059628

View : 16 | Download : 5

Publication Date : 2022-09-30

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :The purpose of this study was to investigate the Type I Error findings and power rates of the methods used to determine dimensionality in unidimensional and bidimensional psychological constructs for various conditions insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(characteristic of the distribution, sample size, length of the test, and interdimensional correlation); and to examine the joint effect of the conditions insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(effect of the interaction of conditions); as well as the main effect of each condition. The simulative data were generated for the study using the SAS program. Within the scope of the study, the data were analyzed using the DIMTEST T statistic and the Dimensionality DETECT IDN index, which is one of the non-parametric methods. The Nonlinear Factor Analysis insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(NOHARM); method was preferred from among parametric methods. As a result of the study, it was noted that the most consistent results in making the unidimensionality decisions belong to the Nonlinear Factor Analysis method showing standard normal distribution according to the shape of the distribution. When the power study results were examined, it was noted that the DIMTEST T statistic gave more accurate results in conditions with large samples, consisting of data with standard normal distribution. On the other hand, while results of the DETECT IDN index and Nonlinear factor analysis were more internally consistent, it was noted that in conditions where the sample size was 1000 and above, the DIMTEST T statistic also made the right decisions in determining dimensionality.
Keywords : Dimensionality, Construct validity, DIMTEST T statistic, DETECT, Nonlinear factor analysis