- Research in Sport Education and Sciences
- Volume:6 Issue:1
- 46. DÜNYA GREKOROMEN VE 35. DÜNYA SERBEST GÜREŞ ŞAMPİYONASI MÜSABAKA TEKNİK ANALİZİ KARŞILAŞTIRILMAS...
46. DÜNYA GREKOROMEN VE 35. DÜNYA SERBEST GÜREŞ ŞAMPİYONASI MÜSABAKA TEKNİK ANALİZİ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI / COMPETITION ANALYSIS OF 46. WORLD GRECO-ROMAAN AND 35. WORLD FREE-STYLE WRESTLING CHAMPIONSHİPS
Authors : Ş. KOLUKISA, O. İMAMOĞLU, M. A. ZİYAGİL, N. F. KİSHALI
Pages : 0-0
View : 10 | Download : 6
Publication Date : 2010-02-21
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Amaç:2001 Dünya Greko-romen ve Serbest Güreş Şampiyonalan müsabaka teknik\` analizi ve başanda etken olan teknik kriterlerin karştlaştmlmasıdır. Materyal ve metot.Bu çalışma için 46. Dünya Greko-romen Güreş Şampiyonasında toplam 334 ve 35. Dünya Serbest Güreş Şampiyonasmda toplam 311 güreş müsabakası kamera ile filme alınarak videoda analiz edildi. Şampiyonada tüm müsabakalar ve Türk Milli TakırrJlnm yaptığı müsabakalarda uygulanan teknik sayısl,puan, pasivite, müsabaka bitiş şekli ve süresi ortalama ve yüzde olarak sunuldu. Bulgular: Genelolarak maçlann büyük çoğunluğu normal sürede ve sayı ile sonuçlanmıştır. Grekoromende en çok kullanilan teknikler çırpma, sa/to, supless ve salto paratı yer alırken, klasman grubunda çırpma, çırpma paratı, tekkol ve bele girme öne çıkmış ve supfess hiç yapılmamıştır. Türklerin en çok uyguladığı oyunlar çırpma, supfess ve künde iken maruz kalman teknikfer, çırpma, solto ve künde paratı olarak öne çıkıyor.Serbestte ise En çok yapılan oyumlar toplamda tek daIma, çırpma,boyunduruk ve çift daIma iken klasman maçlannda tek daima, çırpma, boyunduruk ve çift daIma ve Türk takımmda tek daima, çırpma, boyunduruk ve çift daIma şeklindedir. Türk takımmm maruz kaldığı oyunlar ise tek daIma, çırpma ve çift dalmadır. Grekoramende maç başma düşen teknik sayısı genelde 3,94 ve alman puan sayısı 6,67 iken Serbest stilde maç başma düşen teknik sayısı 5,11 ve puan sayısı 7,64 bulunmuştur.Grekoromende Türklerin maç başma uyguladığı teknik 2,42 ve alman puan 4.2 iken klasman grubunda teknik 3,37 ve alman puan 5,50 dir. Serbestfe ise Türklerin maç başma 2,91 teknik ve 4,75 puan ve kfasman maçlarmda maç başma 4.12 teknik ve 5,50 puan düşmüştür. Sonuç: Grekoromen müsabakafarda en çok çırpma, suples ve bele girme uygulan/rken serbestte ise tek daima, çırpma ve boyunduruk uygulanmıştır. Güreşçilerin riske girmeden puan alma yolunu seçtikleri ve şampiyon olmak için ortalama maç başma yakfaşık ofarak Grekoramende 7 ve serbestte 8 puan düşmüştür ihtar ve pasivite durumlannda yerde partner pozisyonu altnması yer tekniklerinin önemini ve sayısmı artırmıştır. Türkiye uygufadığı tekniklerde etkisiz kalmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Gü~eş, Teknik, Puan, Pasivite SUMMARY The aim of this study was to anafyze the competitions in 46. World Greco-Roman and in 35. World Free-Style Championships, and to examine the technique values of the National Turkish Team. The Greco-Roman Championship was in the city of Patras in Greece at 6-9 December 2001 The Free-Styfe Championship was in Sofia at 21-25 December 2001. 334 greco-roman and 311 free-style comp.etitions were recorded and the analysis were done by these recordings. The way of winnings, the finishing times, the technique numbers, the points and the passivity numbers of the whole and the Cıassifying competitions; the techniques that the Turkish Team exposed to and applied were determined and signed on the competition analysis forms. For statisticaf anafysis, ratio for one competition insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC); for each parameter was calcufated. In these championships, most of the greco-roman and the free-styfe competitions finished in official time and by points in af! weight categories. Same status is vafidity for the Turkish team and the classifying competitions. fn the greco-roman wrestling, totaf 1317 techniques insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(R. 3.94); were appfied and 2231 poin~s insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC. 6.67); were taken; 593 passivity insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 1.77); and 114 tying salto insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDe: 034); were performed. In the free-style 1590\`techniques insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 5.11); were applied and2376 poinfs insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 7.64); were faken, 296 passivity insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 0.95); and 32 tying sa/to insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 0.10); were performed. The Turkish Greco-Roman Wrestfing Team applied 51 fechniques insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 2.42); took 84 points insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 4.2); and exposed fo 37 techniques insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 1.76); gave 62 points insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC.· 3.1);. The Turkish Free-Style Wrestling Team applied 70 techniques insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 2.91); took 114 points insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC.· 4.75); and exposed to 53 techniques insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 291); gave 73 points insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDe.- 3.04);. in the greco-roman and free-style classifying competitions, respectively 54 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 3.37); and 66 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDe: 4.12); techniques were applied; 88 points insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RDC: 5.50); were taken in both sty/e. Most executing techniques were gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(29.62 %);, tying salto insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(14.81 %); and counter to gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(9-25 %); in the classifying greco-roman; leg tackle insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(36.36 %);, gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(16.66 %); and head drug insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(12.12 %); in the classifying free-styte wresWng. The Turkish Greco-Roman Wrestling Team executed mostly gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(33.33 %); and warning point insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(11.76 %);; mostfy exposed to gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(21.62 %); and throw back insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(16.21 %);. The Turkish Free-Style Wrestling Team executed mostly leg tackle insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(24.3 %); and gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(20 %);; exposed to mostly leg tackle insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(28.30 %);, gut wrench insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(13.20 %); and double leg tackle insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(13.20 %);. Wrestlers choosed to take points without risk and to be successful it was necessary to take 8 points in greco-roman and 7 points in free-style for one competition. To win a competition it\`s important to app/y and not expose to a technique. The National Turkish Greco-Roman Team was unsuccessfu/ to apply a technique. Nationat Turkish Free-Styte Team didn\`t wrestle as offensively as their successfu/ riva/s. For the coming championships; it\`s necessary to train right and teft offensive and defensive techniques. According to the posifion, advantages and disadvantages of the techniques have to be taught to the wrestlers. The trainers can regulate the wrestlers\` training programs by considering the techniques used by the general, and also semifinalist and champion wrestlers in the championships. Key Words: Wrestling, competition, analysis.Keywords :