THE SITUATIONS TO BE DECIDED WITHOUT A HEARING ON PROCEDURAL MATTERS IN THE APPEAL IN TURKISH CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW

Authors : Derya Buluttekin

Pages : 387-420

View : 29 | Download : 22

Publication Date : 2024-06-30

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :In Turkish civil procedure law, with the commencement of the regional courts of justice, a three-tier judicial system was introduced. Accordingly, inconclusive final decisions given by the first instance courts will first be subject to appeal legal review, if there are conditions. The Appeal, like appeal, is an ordinary remedy. Unlike the appeal review, the appeal review provides both procedural and legal compliance review. It is not necessary to hold a hearing in the appeal remedy, but a hearing will be held if necessary. However, the article 353/1-a of Turkish Code of Civil Procedure, it is regulated that the regional court of justice will decide on some of the files that have passed the preliminary examination stage in the appeal without a hearing. When the judge who is prohibited from hearing the case has made a decision, if the judge who was rejected despite the justified recusal request has heard the case, if the competent court has improperly ruled in a manner unauthorized or on lack of jurisdiction or has heard the case despite not having jurisdiction or competence, if there is a violation of other litigation conditions, if the court has deemed the lawsuit or counterclaim not filed in violation of the procedure, in case of a decision to consolidate or separate the cases, the failure of the court to collect or evaluate evidence that is important enough to be effective in the resolution of the dispute, or the failure to decide on a significant part of what is requested from the court, the all foregoing are serious procedural matters and the regional courts of justice will decide on these issues without a hearing.
Keywords : Olağan kanun yolları, istinaf, istinafta duruşma, mutlak istinaf sebepleri